§

Karin C.,1 Complainant, v. Betsy DeVos, Secretary, Department of Education, Agency.

0120161208 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 15, 2018)
Karin C.,1 Complainant, v. Betsy DeVos, Secretary, Department of Education, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,614 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  3. Corning Glass Works v. Brennan

    417 U.S. 188 (1974)   Cited 1,404 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the burden of proof to show that it falls within the stated exemption

  4. Schnellbaecher v. Baskin Clothing Co.

    887 F.2d 124 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 284 times
    Holding "[b]ecause both the EEOC charge and the ensuing investigation were insufficient to put the defendants on notice of any intention of the plaintiffs to make allegations of class-wide discrimination in their complaint, the district judge was correct in dismissing the charges of class-wide discrimination."

  5. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.

    567 F.2d 429 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 353 times
    Holding that under Title VII class action, single-filing cannot revive claims that are no longer viable at the time of filing