§

Kansas Refined Helium Co.

252 N.L.R.B. 1156 (N.L.R.B. 1980)
Kansas Refined Helium Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  3. Tank Truck Rentals v. Commissioner

    356 U.S. 30 (1958)   Cited 118 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Observing that the presumption effectuates Congress's "broad basic policy of taxing ‘net not ... gross, income’ " (quoting McDonald v. Comm'r , 323 U.S. 57, 66–67, 65 S.Ct. 96, 89 L.Ed. 68 (1944) )

  4. Commissioner v. Sullivan

    356 U.S. 27 (1958)   Cited 69 times
    Holding operating expenses business illegal under state law were deductible for federal tax purposes

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  7. Heinrich Motors, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    403 F.2d 145 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 30 times
    In Heinrich Motors, Inc. v. NLRB, 403 F.2d 145, 148 (2d Cir. 1968), we characterized the General Counsel's burden as that of "going forward with evidence that the employee has not wilfully incurred a loss of earnings," and cited Mastro Plastics for the proposition.

  8. Bagel Bakers Council of Greater N.Y. v. NLRB

    555 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 18 times
    Holding that costs should not be shifted "from the employers to the employees harmed by illegal conduct"

  9. Oil, Chemical Atomic Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    445 F.2d 237 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 23295, 23300, 23750, 23751. Argued November 3, 1970. Decided May 27, 1971. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., for petitioner in Nos. 23,295 and 23,300. Mr. Marvin J. Martin, with whom Mr. W. Stanley Churchill, Wichita, Kan., was on the brief, for petitioner in Nos. 23,750 and 23,751 and intervenor in Nos. 23,295 and 23,300. Mr. Joseph E. Mayer, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, for respondent. Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Carpenters Un.

    433 F.2d 934 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 6 times

    No. 22296. October 22, 1970. Arnold L. Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg and Avrum M. Goldberg, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Victor J. Van Bourg, of Levy and Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES, HAMLEY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This case is before us upon petition of the National Labor