§

Kankakee County Training Center for the Disabled, Inc.

366 NLRB No. 181 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Kankakee County Training Center for the Disabled, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Tr. Co.

    339 U.S. 306 (1950)   Cited 10,573 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process requires a hearing "appropriate to the nature of the case"

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 734 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

  4. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  5. Service Emp. Int. v. Nati. Labor Relations

    647 F.3d 435 (2d Cir. 2011)   Cited 33 times

    Docket No. 10–3616–ag. 2011-08-1 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 32BJ, Petitioner,v.NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Andrew L. Strom, Office of the General Counsel, SEIU Local 32BJ, New York, NY, for Petitioner.Ronald Meisburg, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel (Robert Englehart, Supervisory Attorney, David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, on the brief),

  6. Conair Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    721 F.2d 1355 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 48 times
    In Conair, the Board, in marked contrast to this case, had specifically found that no other remedy could "dissipate the lingering effects of [Conair's] massive and unrelenting coercive conduct" which "ha[d] foreclosed any possibility of holding a fair representation election."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Triple A Fire Protection, Inc.

    136 F.3d 727 (11th Cir. 1998)   Cited 14 times
    Finding per se violation of the NLRA's prohibition against direct dealing where employer "deal[t] directly with employees outside the normal channels of collective bargaining" in an attempt "to dissuade employees from supporting the union and create incentives for them to abandon their support for the union"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transpersonnel, Inc.

    349 F.3d 175 (4th Cir. 2003)   Cited 8 times
    Recognizing the probative value of objective and reliable hearsay evidence

  9. Northern Wire Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    887 F.2d 1313 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 88-3278, 88-3461. Argued June 6, 1989. Decided October 26, 1989. Jack D. Walker, Susan C. Sheeran, Melli, Walker, Pease Ruhly, Madison, Wis., for Northern Wire Corporation. Aileen A. Armstrong, Collis Suzanne Stocking, Robert F. Mace, N.L.R.B. Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph A. Szabo, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, Wis., for N.L.R.B. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUDAHY, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Associated General Contractors

    633 F.2d 766 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 33 times

    No. 79-7484. Argued and Submitted September 9, 1980. Decided October 16, 1980. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1980. Jerrold J. Wohlgemuth, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James P. Watson, Los Angeles, Cal. (on brief), for respondent. Victor J. Van Bourg, Van Bourg, Allen, Weinberg Roger, San Francisco, Cal., for intervenor. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WRIGHT and POOLE, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. Of the District of