Kanakis Co., Inc

20 Cited authorities

  1. Bowen v. City of New York

    476 U.S. 467 (1986)   Cited 4,740 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding claims collateral because plaintiffs "neither sought nor were awarded benefits ... but rather challenged the Secretary’s failure to follow the application regulations"
  2. DelCostello v. Teamsters

    462 U.S. 151 (1983)   Cited 3,357 times
    Holding that a claim for breach of the duty of fair representation must be filed within six months after it accrues
  3. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell

    451 U.S. 56 (1981)   Cited 757 times
    Holding that a plaintiff first must establish that the union breached its duty of fair representation before a court may consider evidence of an employer's alleged violation of a CBA
  4. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  6. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.

    596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"
  8. Ott v. Midland-Ross Corp.

    600 F.2d 24 (6th Cir. 1979)   Cited 76 times
    Finding estoppel may be appropriate when employer falsely assured employee that it would settle the claim by appointing him to a new position
  9. United States v. Krause

    507 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 32 times
    Noting that a false statement need not be sworn or verified to be a section 1001 violation
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Georgetown Dress Corp.

    537 F.2d 1239 (4th Cir. 1976)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that under principles of agency law the union was responsible for the misdeeds of employees that volunteered to, among other things, solicit other employees to sign authorization cards
  11. Section 1001 - Statements or entries generally

    18 U.S.C. § 1001   Cited 7,490 times   307 Legal Analyses
    Making false statements
  12. Section 504 - Costs and fees of parties

    5 U.S.C. § 504   Cited 657 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing payment of attorney's fees by the Government when a party prevails in a federal agency adjudication