ยง

Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

187 N.L.R.B. 661 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Warren Company

    350 U.S. 107 (1955)   Cited 39 times
    Noting that Congress gave the NLRB civil contempt power to enforce compliance with the NLRB's orders

  3. Surprenant Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 60 times
    In Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965) this Court approved as non-threatening, language of the employer which was much stronger than that used in the present case.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Yazoo Valley Electric Power Ass'n

    405 F.2d 479 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 8 times

    No. 25693. December 26, 1968. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Ian D. Lanoff, Frank H. Itkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Richard C. Keenan, Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before GEWIN and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges, and CHOATE, District Judge. PER CURIAM: The Board seeks enforcement of its order that respondent is guilty of violating ยง 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations

  5. Great Southern T. Co. v. National L. Rel. Bd.

    139 F.2d 984 (4th Cir. 1944)   Cited 17 times

    No. 4874. January 10, 1944. Petition for rule to show cause, to adjudge in contempt, and for other relief. Proceedings on petition by National Labor Relations Board for an order adjudging the Great Southern Trucking Company and L.A. Raulerson in contempt of a decree enforcing an order of the Board. Order issued. Winthrop A. Johns and A. Norman Somers, Attys., both of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, and Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, both of Washington, D.C., on the brief)