§
K Mart Corp.

11 Cited authorities

  1. DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trades Council

    485 U.S. 568 (1988)   Cited 729 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union’s distribution of handbills at the entrances of a shopping mall was not threatening, coercing, or restraining within meaning of section 8(b) because there had been "no violence, picketing, or patrolling," and "no suggestion that the leaflets had any coercive effect on customers of the mall"

  2. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  3. Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 U.S. 645 (1982)   Cited 269 times
    Holding that "the Court of Appeals lack[ed] jurisdiction to review objections that were not urged before the Board"

  4. Connell Co. v. Plumbers Steamfitters

    421 U.S. 616 (1975)   Cited 285 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agreement between a union and a nonlabor party, which is wholly-unrelated to any collective-bargaining effort on the part of the union and which operates or threatens to operate as a restraint on trade, may be the basis for a federal antitrust suit

  5. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent

  6. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

  7. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    447 U.S. 490 (1980)   Cited 65 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Longshoremen, 447 U.S. 490 (1980) (ILA I), we reviewed the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion that the Rules and their enforcement constituted unlawful secondary activity under §§ 8(b)(4)(B) and 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4) (B) and 158(e).

  9. Sparks Nugget, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    968 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1992)   Cited 19 times
    In Sparks Nugget, the Ninth Circuit went further by finding that the inaccessibility exception does not apply at all in situations where customers, and not employees, are the target audience; alternatively, the court stated that, even if the exception were applicable, Lechmere would require a finding that the intended audience is presumptively not inaccessible "because the targets of the union protest do not reside on the employer's property."

  10. Associated Gen. Contractors of Cal. v. N.L.R.B

    514 F.2d 433 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 22 times

    No. 73-3354. March 28, 1975. John H. Stephens (argued), of Cox, Castle, Nicholson Weepes, Los Angeles Cal., for petitioner. Sandra R. McCandless (argued), NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KOELSCH and KILKENNY, Circuit Judge, and SOLOMON, District Judge. Honorable Gus J. Solomon, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. OPINION SOLOMON, District Judge: Associated General Contractors of California