§
K Mart Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  3. Turnbull Cone Baking Co. v. N.L.R.B

    778 F.2d 292 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 51 times
    In Turnbull Cone, we unequivocally established that "[c]ircumstantial evidence alone may be sufficient" to prove a section 8(a)(3) transgression.

  4. Prill v. N.L.R.B

    835 F.2d 1481 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 27 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that an employee takes concerted action “when he acts with the actual participation or on the authority of his co-workers”

  5. Dayton Typographic Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    778 F.2d 1188 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 25 times
    Finding the employer's "lack of work" defense unconvincing where the employer hired two new employees to do part-time work in the same department as the discharged employee

  6. Standard-Coosa-Thatcher Carpet v. N.L.R.B

    691 F.2d 1133 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 19 times
    Enforcing the Board’s application of the per se rule

  7. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under § 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co.

    344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co., 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 617, we recognized that an employer has no vested right to insist that union representation be established by a Board conducted election but we further held that an employer acting in good faith belief that a union lacked majority representation was not required to recognize and bargain with the union until such doubt was resolved.

  9. Zapex Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    621 F.2d 328 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 5 times
    In Zapex Corp. v. NLRB, 621 F.2d 328, 334 (9th Cir.1980), the Board challenged the administrative law judge's (ALJ) "fail[ure] to draw an adverse inference from (the companies') failure to produce subpoenaed records[.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. E.D.S. Service Corporation

    466 F.2d 157 (9th Cir. 1972)   Cited 2 times

    No. 71-2386. September 5, 1972. Roger C. Hartley, Atty. (argued), Elliot Moore, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.; Roy O. Hoffman, Director, Region 20 N.L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. Robert V. Magor (argued), of Severson, Werson, Berke Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HUFSTEDLER, LUMBARD and CHOY, Circuit Judges. The Honorable J. Edward Lambard, Senior Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit,