K. M. & M. Construction Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Red Star Exp. Lines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In Red Star Express Lines v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 196 F.2d 78, the court condemned the contract although the so-called general savings clause provided that any specific provision which was even "affected" by Taft-Hartley was to be without effect.
  2. United States v. Lowe

    234 F.2d 919 (3d Cir. 1956)   Cited 28 times

    No. 11789. Argued May 10, 1956. Decided June 14, 1956. John W. McGeehan, Jr., Newark, N.J., Max Mehler, Newark, N.J., of counsel (Anthony A. Calandra, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellant. Pierre P. Garven, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J. (Raymond Del Tufo, Jr., U.S. Atty., Hamilton F. Kean, Asst. U.S. Atty., Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee. Before MARIS, GOODRICH and KALODNER, Circuit Judges. GOODRICH, Circuit Judge. The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction in a prosecution

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gottfried Baking

    210 F.2d 772 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 24 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Gottfried Baking Co., 210 F.2d 772 (2 Cir., 1954), this court considered and rejected the same argument on nearly identical facts: "We think it is unimportant whether or not the Association existed as a formal entity, so long as it is clear that [the employer] acted jointly with other employers in the Association in the negotiation of collective agreements, as the impact upon interstate commerce would be the same in either case."
  4. O'Shea v. Jewel Tea Co.

    233 F.2d 530 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 21 times
    Holding court erred in striking testimony regarding plaintiff's treatment for prior foot injury where plaintiff claimed injury to same foot in present case; stating that such evidence might tend to show that the plaintiff's present condition was partially or wholly due to the prior injury
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood

    225 F.2d 343 (8th Cir. 1955)   Cited 21 times

    No. 15175. August 26, 1955. Frederick U. Reel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Robert H. Hurt, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., for respondent. Albert J. Goldberg, Washington, D.C., filed brief for Central States Drivers Council as amicus curiae. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN, and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. JOHNSEN

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Ohio Calcium Co.

    133 F.2d 721 (6th Cir. 1943)   Cited 21 times

    No. 9217. February 19, 1943. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order against the Ohio Calcium Company. Decree in accordance with opinion. Fannie M. Boyls, of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Ernest A. Gross, Howard Lichtenstein, Ruth Weyand, and Fannie M. Boyls, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert T. Caldwell, of Ashland, Ky. (Robert T. Caldwell and Porter M

  7. District 50, Etc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    237 F.2d 585 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 12887, 12950. Argued April 9, 1956. Decided October 4, 1956. Mr. E. Crampton Harris, Birmingham, Ala., with whom Messrs. Yelverton Cowherd and Alfred D. Treherne, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 12,887. Mr. Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, David P. Findling, Associate

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Garfunkel

    162 F.2d 256 (2d Cir. 1947)   Cited 1 times

    No. 129, Docket 20356. July 1, 1947. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board for an order enforcing an order of the board directing Jacob and Hyman Garfunkel and others to bargain collectively with the United Candy and Confectionery Workers Union of Local 50 of the Congress of Industrial Organization, and enjoining them from giving effect to a contract between themselves and the Candy and Confectionery Workers Union, Local 452, of the American Federation of Labor, wherein the local union