§

Julian A. McDermott Corp.

184 N.L.R.B. 491 (N.L.R.B. 1970)
Julian A. McDermott Corp.

16 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company

    418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 63 times
    Offering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative

  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co.

    351 F.2d 693 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 33 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Melrose Processing Co., 8 Cir., 351 F.2d 693, also decided since this case was submitted, this court stated that if the factual conclusion of the Board is based upon substantial evidence on the whole record, this court must accept such factual determination as binding. Jas. H. Matthews Co. v. N.L.R.B., 8 Cir., 354 F.2d 432, decided December 29, 1965, adheres to these principles.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Schill Steel Products, Inc.

    340 F.2d 568 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 28 times

    No. 21110. January 11, 1965. Lawrence Gold, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert A. Armstrong, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Henry L. Scott, Houston, Tex., Trotter, Childs, Fortenbach McClure, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HANNAY, District Judge. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Symons Manufacturing Co.

    328 F.2d 835 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 22 times

    No. 14305. March 4, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gladys Kessler, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Michael N. Sohn, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. John Harrington and Albert J. Smith, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before DUFFY and KNOCH, Circuit Judges, and MERCER, District Judge. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations Board (Board) petitions

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Pembeck Oil Corp.

    404 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Pembeck, decided after Better Val-U Stores, Judge Hays again dissented, pointing out that neither Flomatic nor Val-U Stores had reached to § 8(a)(5) cases and urging that the "flagrant violation" standard not be extended to such cases.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. South Rambler Company

    324 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 19 times

    No. 17301. November 20, 1963. Arthur M. Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for the National Labor Relations Board. John E. Tate, Omaha, Neb., for respondent. Before MATTHES and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges, and MICKELSON, District Judge. MATTHES, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board

  8. Revere Camera Company v. N.L.R.B

    304 F.2d 162 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 19 times

    No. 13561. June 12, 1962. David H. Mendelsohn, Thomas J. Finnegan, Chicago, Ill., Sidney R. Korshak, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, for National Labor Relations Board. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and CASTLE and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case is before the Court pursuant to Section 10(e) and (f) of the National Labor

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mrak Coal Co.

    322 F.2d 311 (9th Cir. 1963)   Cited 10 times

    No. 18575. September 9, 1963. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Robert A. Armstrong and Charles Henderson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Burr, Boney Pease and D.A. Burr, Anchorage, Alaska, for respondent. Before BARNES, HAMLEY and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to enforce the Board's order based on a finding that respondent violated § 8(a)(1)

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Elec. City Dyeing

    178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Electric City Dyeing Co., 178 F.2d 980 (3d Cir. 1950), this court had occasion to rule on a comparable situation where the employer alleged that certain employees were discharged for unsatisfactory work whereas the Board made a finding, in which we concurred, that the dismissals were for union activity.