§

Julia Pettis, Appellant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

01964038 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 2, 1999)
Julia Pettis, Appellant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Williams v. Meese

    926 F.2d 994 (10th Cir. 1991)   Cited 1,678 times
    Holding inmates are not 'employees' under the Rehabilitation Act

  2. Hale v. Arizona

    993 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 480 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding prisoners in work program are not entitled to minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act

  3. Henthorn v. Dep't of Navy

    29 F.3d 682 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 222 times
    Holding that prisoner who was legally required to work and whose compensation was set and paid by prison was not employee under FLSA

  4. Spirides v. Reinhardt

    613 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 272 times
    Holding "no one factor is determinative" of whether individual is employee or independent contractor for purposes of Title VII

  5. Hyland v. New Haven Radiology Associates, P.C

    794 F.2d 793 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 79 times
    Holding that for the FLSA, Title VII, and the ADEA, "cases construing the definitional provisions of one are persuasive authority when interpreting the others"

  6. Gonzalez v. Department of Army

    718 F.2d 926 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 77 times
    Holding that a Major in the United States Army could not sue the Department of the Army for allegedly discriminatory denial of promotions

  7. Baker v. McNeil Island Corrections Center

    859 F.2d 124 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 61 times
    Holding that inmate stated cognizable claim under Title VII by alleging that he was denied employment at prison library due to his race

  8. Johnson v. Alexander

    572 F.2d 1219 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 76 times
    Holding that an applicant for enlistment in the United States Army could not sue Army officials for denying his enlistment

  9. Coupar v. United States Department of Labor

    105 F.3d 1263 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that because a federal prisoner's job fulfilled a prison work requirement, he was not an "employee" who could enforce the "whistleblower protection provisions" of the Clean Air Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act

  10. Johnson v. Hoffman

    424 F. Supp. 490 (E.D. Mo. 1977)   Cited 19 times
    Naming Secretary of Defense and unspecified others