§

Judge & Dolph, Ltd.

333 N.L.R.B. 175 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Judge & Dolph, Ltd.

19 Cited authorities

  1. Communications Workers of America v. Beck

    487 U.S. 735 (1988)   Cited 277 times   44 Legal Analyses
    Holding that non-members could not be charged "to support union activities beyond those germane to collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance adjustment"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  3. Garment Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 731 (1961)   Cited 213 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union cannot represent a group of employees for which it does not enjoy majority support

  4. Hendry Corp. v. United States Fidelity

    393 U.S. 978 (1968)   Cited 63 times

    No. 537. December 9, 1968, OCTOBER TERM, 1968. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Stanley W. Rosenkranz and Charles W. Pittman for petitioner. E. Dixie Beggs for respondent. Reported below: 391 F. 2d 13.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029

    409 U.S. 213 (1972)   Cited 53 times
    In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.

  6. Pacific Southwest Airlines v. N.L.R.B

    587 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 31 times
    In Pacific Southwest Airlines, we discussed extensively the considerations relevant in determining whether employees are plant clericals or office clericals.

  7. Sheraton-Kauai Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    429 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir. 1970)   Cited 39 times
    Holding that whether new employees constitute an accretion to an existing unit cannot be stipulated by contract

  8. N.L.R.B. v. R. L. Sweet Lumber Company

    515 F.2d 785 (10th Cir. 1975)   Cited 28 times

    No. 74-1065. Submitted September 13, 1974. Decided May 13, 1975. Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Charles E. Hoffhaus, Kansas City, Mo. (Hillix, Brewer Myers, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondent. George A. Lowe, Olathe, Kan., on the brief, for intervenor

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Carson Cable TV

    795 F.2d 879 (9th Cir. 1986)   Cited 13 times
    Holding “day-to-day control of labor relations” by local managers insufficient to defeat finding a single employer

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Western and Southern Life Ins. Co.

    391 F.2d 119 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 26 times

    No. 16621. Argued October 3, 1967. Decided March 4, 1968. Warren M. Davison, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda Sher, Attorney, N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. John G. Wayman, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa. (W.D. Armour, Pittsburgh, Pa., Ithamar D. Weed, Cincinatti, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before STALEY, Chief Judge, and MARIS and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges