Joseph Stallone Electrical Contractors, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Hospital San Pablo, Inc.

    207 F.3d 67 (1st Cir. 2000)   Cited 11 times

    No. 99-1666. Heard January 7, 2000. Decided March 27, 2000. ON PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. John D. Burgoyne, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, were on brief, for petitioner. Jay A. García-Gregory, with whom Tristán Reyes-Gilestra and Fiddler, Gonzalez Rodriguez, LLP were on brief

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
  7. Crown Cork Seal Co. v. N.L.R.B

    36 F.3d 1130 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that remand was unnecessary because the agency had "suggested no alternative bases for upholding" its determination
  8. GSX Corp. of Missouri v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    918 F.2d 1351 (8th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Reviewing board's findings more critically where board's findings are contrary to ALJ's
  9. Charlotte Amphitheater Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    82 F.3d 1074 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 11 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that all Circuits except the Ninth require the NLRB to consider changed circumstances when issuing Gissel bargaining orders
  10. International Brotherhood of Boilermakers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    127 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 1997)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 95-3688. November 13, 1997. Michael T. Manley, Blake Uhlig, P.A., Kansas City, KS, for IBB. Dion Kohler, C. Thomas Davis, Lee Stanford Sherrill, Atlanta, GA, for H. B. Zachry Co. Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. General Counsel, Nancy B. Hunt, Margaret G. Neigus, Frederick C. Havard, Jill A. Griffin, NLRB, Washington, DC, for NLRB. Petition for Review and Cross Petition for Review of the National Labor Relations Board. (Agency Nos. 12-CA-14962, 12-CA-14962-2 12-CA-15018) Before CARNES, Circuit