Joseph Edward Page

9 Cited authorities

  1. Dranoff-Perlstein Associates v. Sklar

    967 F.2d 852 (3d Cir. 1992)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that mark corresponding to telephone number is entitled to trademark protection only to extent that it serves as "an indicator of source, sponsorship, approval or affiliation"
  2. Kelley Blue Book v. Car-Smarts, Inc.

    802 F. Supp. 278 (C.D. Cal. 1992)   Cited 36 times
    Enjoining defendants from using the phrase "blue book" in connection with advertising or distributing automobile pricing information but not enjoining the use of the 800 telephone number
  3. Dial-A-Mattress Franchise Corp. v. Page

    880 F.2d 675 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that competitor's use of a confusingly similar telephone number can constitute either trademark infringement or unfair competition and enjoining competitor's use of "1-800-MATTRESS" to protect plaintiff's local use of telephone number "MATTRESS"
  4. Application of Abcor Development Corp.

    588 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Abcor, the question before the court was whether applicant's alleged mark (GASBADGE) was "merely descriptive" within the meaning of § 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1).
  5. In re Gyulay

    820 F.2d 1216 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the Board did not err in affirming the examiner's prima facie case that the mark was merely descriptive
  6. 800 Spirits Inc. v. Liquor by Wire, Inc.

    14 F. Supp. 2d 675 (D.N.J. 1998)   Cited 4 times
    In 800 Spirits, Inc. v. Liquor By Wire, Inc., 14 F. Supp.2d 675 (D.N.J. 1998), the court was presented with the question of whether "spirits" was a generic term for gifts of alcoholic beverages.
  7. Murrin v. Midco Communications, Inc.

    726 F. Supp. 1195 (D. Minn. 1989)   Cited 8 times
    Granting a limited injunction forbidding the advertisement or use of the vanity number 1-800-LAWYER with "dial" or with any symbols resembling dots or hyphens between the letters "LAWYERS" but explicitly rejecting the argument that any use of the phone number 529-9377 — which spells "lawyers" on the telephone keypad — constitutes infringement upon Murrin's "Dial L.A.W.Y.E.R.S." service mark
  8. Bell v. Kidan

    836 F. Supp. 125 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)

    93 Civ. 3283 (LLS) June 8, 1993. Abelman Frayne Schwab, Jeffrey A. Schwab and Michael Aschen (of counsel), New York City, for plaintiff. Duncan Associates, Adam R. Kidan (of counsel), New York City, for defendants. MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT LOUIS STANTON, District Judge. Plaintiff Richard Bell moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from using, advertising or promoting a telephone number mnemonic which Bell asserts is confusingly similar to his trademarked

  9. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,910 times   126 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark