§

Joro Companies, Inc. v. Trashbusters Inc.

No. 92048605 (T.T.A.B. Oct. 29, 2008)
Joro Companies, Inc. v. Trashbusters Inc.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Acumed v. Stryker

    525 F.3d 1319 (Fed. Cir. 2008)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a claim for patent infringement is "barred by claim preclusion if that claim arises from the same transactional facts as a prior action"

  2. Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration Systems

    223 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 79 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the same cause of action can exist in two cases only where the same set of transactional facts are involved in those cases and that, where the transactional facts differ, the doctrine of claim preclusion does not apply

  3. Chromalloy American Corp. v. Kenneth Gordon

    736 F.2d 694 (Fed. Cir. 1984)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that infringement litigation between different marks did not claim preclude later petition in opposition to registration