Jonnnie's Poultry Co.

11 Cited authorities

Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Snow v. N.L.R.B
308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962) Cited 30 times
In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.
N.L.R.B. v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc.
315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963) Cited 25 times
In NLRB v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., 315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963), the court listed seventeen factors which supported the Board's conclusion of employee status.
F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
121 F.2d 658 (2d Cir. 1941) Cited 36 times
No. 276. July 2, 1941. Petition to Review and Set Aside an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by F.W. Woolworth Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and request by the board to enforce its order. Petition to review the order denied, and request for enforcement of order as modified in accordance with opinion granted. Thomas I. Sheridan and Howard L. Klein, both of New York City, for petitioner. Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp, Ernest
Henry L. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B
328 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 10 times
In Henry L. Siegel v. NLRB, 328 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1964), we held that an employer violates § 8(a)(1) if he bludgeons his employees into furnishing copies of their statements.
N.L.R.B. v. Barney's Supercenter, Inc.
296 F.2d 91 (3d Cir. 1961) Cited 12 times
No. 13596. Argued October 5, 1961. Decided November 16, 1961. Marion L. Griffin, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jack J. Rosenberg, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board ("Board") seeks enforcement of an order
NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. BETTER MONKEY GRIP
243 F.2d 836 (5th Cir. 1957) Cited 14 times
No. 16278. May 1, 1957. Rehearing Denied May 29, 1957. Owsley Vose, Stephen Leonard, Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Ruth V. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Herbert S. Bonney, Jr., William L. Keller, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before BORAH, RIVES and BROWN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Sec. 10(e) of the National Labor Relations
N.L.R.B. v. Guild Industries Mfg. Corp.
321 F.2d 108 (5th Cir. 1963) Cited 7 times
No. 19736. July 10, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Robert A. Armstrong, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Paul A. Saad, Granville M. Alley, Jr., of Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Raymond J. Malloy, Tampa, Fla., Warren E. Hall, Jr., Bartow, Fla., Mabry, Reaves, Carlton, Fields Ward, Tampa, Fla., for respondents. Before TUTTLE
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Stone
125 F.2d 752 (7th Cir. 1942) Cited 27 times
Holding that employees obligated to sign an arbitration agreement which infringes on Section 7 rights was a per-se violation of the NLRA
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Katz Drug Co.
207 F.2d 168 (8th Cir. 1953) Cited 5 times
No. 14782. September 17, 1953. Thomas J. McDermott, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Lawrence R. Brown, Kansas City, Mo. (Myron K. Ellison, John K. Bestor and Stinson, Mag, Thomson, McEvers Fizzell, Kansas City, Mo., with him on the brief), for respondent
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,090 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Jonnnie's Poultry Co.

11 Cited authorities

In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

In NLRB v. Lindsay Newspapers, Inc., 315 F.2d 709 (5th Cir. 1963), the court listed seventeen factors which supported the Board's conclusion of employee status.

In Henry L. Siegel v. NLRB, 328 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1964), we held that an employer violates § 8(a)(1) if he bludgeons his employees into furnishing copies of their statements.

Holding that employees obligated to sign an arbitration agreement which infringes on Section 7 rights was a per-se violation of the NLRA

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"