Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,499 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
  2. Board v. Hearst Publications

    322 U.S. 111 (1944)   Cited 791 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether newsboys were independent contractors or employees under the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA")
  3. Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.

    311 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 338 times
    Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
  4. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
  5. Holy Trinity Church v. United States

    143 U.S. 457 (1892)   Cited 923 times
    Holding that although the Alien Contract Labor Act made it a crime to contract with or encourage any alien to migrate to the United States "to perform labor or service of any kind," a cleric who emigrated from England to serve as a pastor of a New York church and thus technically fell within the letter of the Act, was exempt from the Act's reach because of the absurd results that would follow from giving such broad meaning to words of the statute
  6. Matter of State Labor Rel. Bd. v. Met. Life Ins. Co.

    183 Misc. 1064 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1944)   Cited 3 times

    November 13, 1944. William E. Grady, Jr., for petitioner. McLanahan, Merritt Ingraham for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others, respondents. Cullen Dykman for Brooklyn Trust Company, respondent. VALENTE, J. In this proceeding (Labor Law, § 707) petitioner seeks enforcement of its order to respondents, apartment-house owners and managers, to bargain collectively with a union representing building superintendents. Each building involved has but a single superintendent, as is commonly the