§

Jones & Carter, Inc./Cotton Surveying Co.

16-CA-027969 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 26, 2012)
Jones & Carter, Inc./Cotton Surveying Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.

    437 U.S. 214 (1978)   Cited 965 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a FOIA requestor's rights are neither “diminished” nor “enhanced” in light of a “particular, litigation-generated need for these materials”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  5. Jackson Hosp. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    647 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 6 times
    Explaining that “[l]ong ago” the NLRB “clarified” that an employee has no right to bring a witness to a meeting, the “sole purpose” of which is to deliver a predetermined warning

  6. Aroostook County v. N.L.R.B

    81 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding NLRB's jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. § 158, part of the National Labor Relations Act, over an employer

  7. Abbey's Transp. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    837 F.2d 575 (2d Cir. 1988)   Cited 25 times
    Finding violation when interrogator was a "lawyer-consultant"

  8. Dayton Typographic Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    778 F.2d 1188 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 25 times
    Finding the employer's "lack of work" defense unconvincing where the employer hired two new employees to do part-time work in the same department as the discharged employee

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Henry Colder Co., Inc.

    907 F.2d 765 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 4 times

    No. 89-2358. Argued April 20, 1990. Decided July 25, 1990. Aileen A. Armstrong, John D. Burgoyne, Robert F. Mace, N.L.R.B. Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph A. Szabo, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Robert Felker, West Allis, Wis., for respondent. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before CUMMINGS, CUDAHY and KANNE, Circuit Judges. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The Henry Colder Company ("Colders"), a Wisconsin furniture and appliance retailer, fired