§

JON P. WESTRUM, D/B/A J. WESTRUM ELECTRIC AND JWE LLC, ALTER EGOS

365 NLRB No. 151 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
JON P. WESTRUM, D/B/A J. WESTRUM ELECTRIC AND JWE LLC, ALTER EGOS

15 Cited authorities

  1. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  4. J. Vallery Elec., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    337 F.3d 446 (5th Cir. 2003)   Cited 25 times
    Finding alter ego bound to collective bargaining agreement

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Whitesell Corp.

    638 F.3d 883 (8th Cir. 2011)   Cited 12 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the denial of enforcement on the basis that the Board lacked a proper quorum did not deprive the Board of jurisdiction to consider the case anew

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Bufco Corp.

    899 F.2d 608 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 33 times
    Adopting Deklewa and applying it retroactively

  7. Midwest Precision Heating v. N.L.R.B

    408 F.3d 450 (8th Cir. 2005)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 04-1862, 04-2056. Submitted: January 10, 2005. Filed: May 19, 2005. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Thomas M. Moore, argued, Kansas City, Missouri (S. Owen Griffin on the brief), for petitioners/cross-appellants. Steven B. Goldstein, argued, Washington, D.C. (Robert J. Englehart, Arthur F. Rosenfeld, John E. Higgins, Jr., John H. Ferguson, and Aileen A. Armstrong on the brief), for respondent/cross-petitioner. Before SMITH, HEANEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit

  8. Minteq Int'l, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    855 F.3d 329 (D.C. Cir. 2017)

    No. 16-1276 C/w 16-1335 04-28-2017 MINTEQ INTERNATIONAL, INC. and Specialty Minerals Inc., wholly owned subsidiaries of Mineral Technologies, Inc., Petitioners v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL–CIO, Intervenor Maurice Baskin argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were A. John Harper III, Houston, TX, Jonathan O. Levine, and Adam P. Tuzzo, Milwaukee, WI. Eric Weitz, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued

  9. Sheehy Enterprizes, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    602 F.3d 839 (7th Cir. 2010)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 09-1383, 09-1656. Argued January 21, 2010. Decided April 20, 2010. Bruce F. Mills (argued), Indianapolis, IN, for Petitioner, Cross-Respondent. Linda J. Dreeben, Richard A. Cohen (argued), National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, Rik Lineback, National Labor Relations Board, Indianapolis, IN, for Respondent, Cross-Petitioner. Neil E. Gath, Fillenwarth, Dennerline, Groth Towe, LLP, Indianapolis, IN, for Intervening-Respondent. Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

  10. Sheehy Enter. Inc. v. Nat. Labor Rel. Bd.

    431 F. App'x 488 (7th Cir. 2011)

    Nos. 10-3688, 10-2966. Submitted July 14, 2011. This successive appeal has been submitted to the original panel pursuant to Operating Procedure 6(b). After reviewing the briefs and the record, the panel is unanimously of the view that oral argument is unnecessary. Accordingly, the appeal has been submitted on the briefs and the record alone. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a). Decided July 14, 2011. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, No