§

Johnson Technology, Inc.

07-CA-045747 (N.L.R.B. Aug. 4, 2004)
Johnson Technology, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  3. Asarco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    86 F.3d 1401 (5th Cir. 1996)   Cited 22 times
    Finding of antiunion animus necessary to finding of section 8 violation

  4. Birch Run Welding Fabricating, v. N.L.R.B

    761 F.2d 1175 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 35 times
    Ordering general layoffs to discourage or retaliate against union activity is unlawful discrimination, even though some employees opposed to the union were laid-off as well

  5. Electromation, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    35 F.3d 1148 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding finding of domination in similar situation

  6. Paudler v. Paudler

    185 F.2d 901 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 18 times
    In Paudler, the Fifth Circuit recognized an individual's right to change domicile for any reason at any time. The jurisdictional inquiry is limited to the fact of relocation and the intended and presumed permanency of that relocation; it does not include consideration of the motivation for making that change.