3 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Scrivener
405 U.S. 117 (1972) Cited 83 timesHolding that protection from retaliation for "fil[ing] charges or giv[ing] testimony" under the National Labor Relations Act extends to an employee who gave a written sworn statement to an NLRB examiner
N.L.R.B. v. Hudson Pulp Paper Corporation
273 F.2d 660 (5th Cir. 1960) Cited 28 timesNo. 17703. January 12, 1960. Alfred Brummel, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Frederick U. Reel, Fred J. Hahn, Attys., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Theo. Hamilton, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has
Metal Procs' Un. L. No. 16, v. N.L.R.B
337 F.2d 114 (D.C. Cir. 1964) Cited 2 timesNo. 18194. Argued March 25, 1964. Decided June 18, 1964. Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Robert M. Lichtman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Stephen B. Goldberg, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Harold B. Shore