§

John W. Hancock, Jr., Inc.

337 N.L.R.B. 1223 (N.L.R.B. 2002)
John W. Hancock, Jr., Inc.

12 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Bourne v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 93 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.

  3. Perdue Farms, Inc. v. Nat. Lbr. Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 830 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times
    Deferring to agency's resolution of contradictory evidence

  4. Medeco Sec. Locks v. National Lab. rel

    142 F.3d 733 (4th Cir. 1998)   Cited 28 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no substantial evidence of knowledge could be inferred from the company's decision to fire a worker within a year after he had ceased to be a visible supporter of the union and had disavowed further interest in the union

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Champion Lab

    99 F.3d 223 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that, "in analyzing [the Board's] application of law to particular facts," this court defers to the Board's inferences and the legal conclusions that it draws from those facts

  6. Sasol North America Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    275 F.3d 1106 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 9 times
    Rejecting the Board's reliance on "two statements" that "do not even remotely constitute evidence of a ‘threat of reprisal or force or promise of benefit’ " (quoting 29 U.S.C. § 158(c) )

  7. Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    115 F.3d 636 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 94-70192, 94-70262 Argued and Submitted August 18, 1995 — San Francisco, California. Filed May 15, 1997 Robert G. Hulteng, Jeffrey S. Bosley, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy Mathiason, San Francisco, CA, for petitioner-cross-respondent, Gardner Mechanical Services, Inc. Charles Donnelly, John J. Fawley, Washington, DC, for respondent-cross-petitioner, National Labor Relations Board. John J. Davis, Jr., McCarthy, Johnson Miller, San Francisco, CA, for respondent-intervenor, U.S. Local 350

  8. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Okun Bros. Shoe Store, Inc.

    825 F.2d 102 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 23 times
    In Meehan v. City of Los Angeles, 825 F.2d 102 (9th Cir. 1988), the Ninth Circuit held that two incidents involving alleged unconstitutional harassment did not support the existence of a custom sufficient to establish municipal liability under Monell.

  10. BE & K Construction Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    133 F.3d 1372 (11th Cir. 1997)   Cited 11 times

    No. 96-6776. Filed October 27, 1997. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board (Alabama Case). (NLRB No. Before BIRCH, Circuit Judge, FAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and COHILL, Senior District Judge. Honorable Maurice B. Cohill, Jr., Senior U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: In this labor case, BE K Construction Company ("BE K") petitions for review and the National Labor Relations