§

John T. King, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

01986497 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 17, 2000)
John T. King, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 243,773 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is appropriate when the evidence is "so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law"

  2. Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

    438 U.S. 567 (1978)   Cited 2,190 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context

  3. Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer

  4. Spangle v. Valley Forge Sewer Authority

    839 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 61 times
    Affirming grant of summary judgment where employee presented no evidence to show he was qualified for the job

  5. Redman v. Warrener

    516 F.2d 766 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 16 times
    In Redman v. Warrener, 516 F.2d 766, 768 (1st Cir. 1975), we admonished: "Summary judgment is not to be turned into a trial by affidavit."