§

John T. King, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

01986497and01996303 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 17, 2000)
John T. King, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 237,147 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

    438 U.S. 567 (1978)   Cited 2,164 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context

  3. Oliver v. Digital Equipment Corp.

    846 F.2d 103 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 413 times
    Holding that discharge over two and one half years after employee filed EEOC complaint was insufficient showing of retaliation to avoid summary judgment for employer

  4. Spangle v. Valley Forge Sewer Authority

    839 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 59 times
    Affirming grant of summary judgment where employee presented no evidence to show he was qualified for the job

  5. Redman v. Warrener

    516 F.2d 766 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 16 times
    In Redman v. Warrener, 516 F.2d 766, 768 (1st Cir. 1975), we admonished: "Summary judgment is not to be turned into a trial by affidavit."