John E. Terenyi, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Ansonia Bd. of Educ. v. Philbrook

    479 U.S. 60 (1986)   Cited 457 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding an accommodation is reasonable where it "allow the individual to observe fully religious holy days and requires him only to give up compensation for a day that he did not in fact work"
  2. Heller v. EBB Auto Co.

    8 F.3d 1433 (9th Cir. 1993)   Cited 139 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the plaintiff established the second element of his prima facie case for failure to accommodate his “religious practice of attending the ceremony in which his wife and children were converted to Judaism,” where the plaintiff's supervisor “knew” that he was Jewish, “knew” that his “wife was studying for conversion,” and “when [the plaintiff] requested the time off, he informed the [supervisor] why he needed to miss work”
  3. Thomas v. Nat'l Ass'n of Letter Carriers

    225 F.3d 1149 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 83 times
    Holding employer offered reasonable accommodation where it approved use of leave on the employee's day of Sabbath, permitted use of substitutes when possible, sought a waiver from the union of the requirement that the employee work five out of six days a week, and recommended the employee bid for other positions that would not require work on Sabbath
  4. Toledo v. Nobel-Sysco, Inc.

    892 F.2d 1481 (10th Cir. 1989)   Cited 70 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an offer was not "unconditional" for purposes of Title VII because the offer "was conditioned on [the employee] dropping his claim, as well as his passing a polygraph test and physical examination."
  5. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,355 times   130 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions
  6. Section 1605.2 - Reasonable accommodation without undue hardship as required by section 701(j) of title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

    29 C.F.R. § 1605.2   Cited 86 times   10 Legal Analyses
    In 29 C.F.R. § 1605.2(e), the EEOC states that it will determine "undue hardship" as "more than a de minimis cost" in accordance with Hardison.