No. CV-08-1687-PHX-GMS. April 9, 2010 ORDER G. SNOW, District Judge Pending before the Court are the parties' separate Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. ## 130, 132.) Both Motions are granted-in-part and denied-in-part, as set forth in this Order. The parties' requests for oral argument are denied as the Court has determined that oral argument will not aid in its decision. See Lake at Las Vegas Investors Group, Inc. v. Pac. Malibu Dev., 933 F.2d 724, 729 (9th Cir. 1991). BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Cyril
Case Number C 05-3387. November 20, 2007 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART WITH LEAVE TO AMEND [re: docket nos. 88, 93, 95]. This disposition is not designated for publication and may not be cited. JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge I. BACKGROUND The factual background of the consolidated actions is set forth in the Court's order dated December 19, 2006 and will not be repeated here. This case involves two separate actions. Action One is based on allegations that IBM improperly removed