§

J.M.A. Holdings

310 N.L.R.B. 1349 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
J.M.A. Holdings

5 Cited authorities

  1. Belknap, Inc. v. Hale

    463 U.S. 491 (1983)   Cited 278 times
    Holding that the NLRA does not preempt state law contract actions by replacement workers to enforce terms of an employment contract

  2. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  3. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  4. H. & F. Binch Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 F.2d 357 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 22 times
    Enlarging reinstatement rights of economic strikers

  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    834 F.2d 816 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 4 times

    No. 86-7598. Argued and Submitted August 4, 1987. Decided December 16, 1987. Irving M. Friedman, Katz, Friedman, Schur Eagle, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Allen R. Ferguson, Jr. and Paul J. Spielberg, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Charles E. Sykes, Bruckner Sykes, Houston, Tex., for respondent-intervenor. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WIGGINS, KOZINSKI and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: International Union