§

J.H. Patterson Co.

217 N.L.R.B. 1030 (N.L.R.B. 1975)
J.H. Patterson Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 711 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  3. Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

    337 U.S. 656 (1949)   Cited 88 times
    Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"

  4. Retail Clerks International Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    373 F.2d 655 (D.C. Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times

    Nos. 19682, 19766. Argued May 24, 1966. Decided January 6, 1967. Mr. Tim L. Bornstein, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. S.G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 19682 and intervenor in No. 19766. Mr. Narcisse A. Brown, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. John W. Noble, Jr., Chicago, Ill., Frederick M. Rowe and Ronald J. Wilson, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner in No

  5. United States v. Brown

    382 F.2d 52 (3d Cir. 1967)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16618. Argued June 23, 1967. Decided August 1, 1967. Bernard L. Segal, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant. Merna B. Marshall, Asst. U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (Drew J.T. O'Keefe, U.S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee. Before BIGGS, KALODNER and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT PER CURIAM: It is settled that an appellate tribunal will not review a judgment of sentence that is within the statutory maximum unless there be a showing of illegality or abuse of discretion

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Aircraft Specialties

    360 F.2d 600 (6th Cir. 1966)   Cited 1 times

    No. 16514. May 13, 1966. Bernard M. Dworski, Atty., N.L.R.B. Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harry H. Meisner, Detroit, Mich. (Meisner Meisner, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for respondent. Before CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judge, CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOYD, District Judge. Honorable Marion Speed Boyd, Chief

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys