J.G. Kern Enterprises, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass

    404 U.S. 157 (1971)   Cited 632 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  3. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
  4. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 301 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board
  5. Camelot Terrace, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    824 F.3d 1085 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 11 times

    No. 12-1071 C/w 12-1218 06-10-2016 Camelot Terrace, Inc. and Galesburg Terrace, Inc., Petitioners v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent Service Employees International Union, Healthcare Illinois Indiana (Previously SEIU Local 4), Intervenor Christopher Landau argued the cause for the petitioners. John S. Irving, Jr., Washington, DC, was with him on brief. Barbara A. Sheehy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for the respondent. Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gimrock Constr., Inc.

    695 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2012)   Cited 2 times

    No. 11–11561. 2012-09-18 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. GIMROCK CONSTRUCTION, INC., Respondent. Ruth E. Burdick, Jeffrey William Burritt, Linda Dreeben, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Charles S. Caulkins, Cathy M. Stutin, Fisher & Phillips, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Respondent. TJOFLAT Ruth E. Burdick, Jeffrey William Burritt, Linda Dreeben, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Petitioner. Charles S. Caulkins, Cathy M. Stutin, Fisher

  7. All Seasons Climate Control, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    540 F. App'x 484 (6th Cir. 2013)

    Case Nos. 11-2184/11-2282 08-28-2013 ALL SEASONS CLIMATE CONTROL, INC., Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. ALICE M. BATCHELDER NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0797n.06 ON APPEAL FROM THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; MERRITT and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges. ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Chief Judge. All Seasons Climate Control, Inc. ("All Seasons") appeals from a decision and order of the National

  8. Lancaster v. N.L.R.B

    233 F. App'x 100 (3d Cir. 2007)

    Nos. 05-1568, 05-2077. Argued on January 30, 2007. Filed: April 3, 2007. On Petition for Review and Petition for Enforcement of a Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board, (NLRB Nos. 4-ca-32498 and 4-ca-32862) Administrative Law Judge: Jane Vandeventer. Amy G. Macinanti [Argued], Kegal, Kelin, Almy Grimm, Lancaster, PA, for Petitioner Lancaster Nissan Inc. Aileen A. Armstrong, Julie B. Broido, Ruth E. Burdick, Fred B. Jacob [Argued], National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC

  9. Calex Corp. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    144 F.3d 904 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that the employees' discussion at pre-strike meeting are significant in finding an unfair labor practice strike
  10. Radiator Specialty Company v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 495 (4th Cir. 1964)   Cited 7 times

    No. 9124. Argued January 14, 1964. Decided August 3, 1964. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief) for petitioner. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief) for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges. ALBERT V. BRYAN, Circuit Judge: The National

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,336 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
  12. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,101 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"