13 Cited authorities
Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
482 U.S. 27 (1987) Cited 369 times 12 Legal AnalysesHolding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal AnalysesHolding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B
70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995) Cited 48 timesHolding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues
U.S. Marine Corp. v. N.L.R.B
944 F.2d 1305 (7th Cir. 1990) Cited 49 timesNos. 89-2051, 89-2140 and 89-2152. Argued December 5, 1989. Decided October 18, 1990. Reheard En Banc June 11, 1991. Decided September 25, 1991. Fred G. Groiss, Quarles Brady, Milwaukee, Wis., James D. Holzhauer (argued), Mayer, Brown Platt, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners/cross-respondents. Kenneth R. Loebel (argued), Previant, Goldberg, Uelman, Gratz, Miller Brueggeman, Milwaukee, Wis., for intervening respondent, petioner. Steven B. Goldstein, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Fred
Canteen Corp. v. N.L.R.B
103 F.3d 1355 (7th Cir. 1997) Cited 18 timesAffirming NLRB's finding of substantial continuity where there was no temporal break in the operation of the two businesses
New Breed Leasing Corp. v. N.L.R.B
111 F.3d 1460 (9th Cir. 1997) Cited 17 timesHolding that an ALJ's credibility determinations will be upheld by the court “unless they are ‘inherently incredible or patently unreasonable’ ”
Pace Industries, Inc. v. Natl. Lab. Rel. Bd.
118 F.3d 585 (8th Cir. 1997) Cited 13 timesNo. 96-1643 Submitted December 11, 1996 Filed July 1, 1997 Myron Boe, Little Rock, AR, argued (Mark Alan Peoples, Little Rock, AR, on the brief), for Petitioners/Cross-Respondents. Bruce E. Buchanan, Little Rock, AR, argued (Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Linda Dreeben, Supervisory Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, on the brief), for Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. Petition
N.L.R.B. v. Staten Island Hotel
101 F.3d 858 (2d Cir. 1996) Cited 8 times 1 Legal AnalysesUpholding finding of anti-union animus from statements such as manager "wasn't going to hire anybody from the union"
N.L.R.B. v. Houston Bldg. Service, Inc.
936 F.2d 178 (5th Cir. 1991) Cited 9 timesNo. 90-4439. July 2, 1991. Margaret Luke, Aileen A. Armstrong, Dep. Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Barbara J. Sapin, Barbara A. Atkin, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Sidney H. Kalban, New York City, for intervenor. Thomas W. Moore, Veda Moore, Moore and Moore, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Michael Dunn, Dir., Region 23, NLRB, Houston, Tex., for other interested parties. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWN, KING and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges
Section 2101 - Definitions; exclusions from definition of loss of employment
29 U.S.C. § 2101 Cited 832 times 39 Legal AnalysesDefining "mass layoff" as "a reduction in force" that is not the result of a plant closing and "(B) results in an employment loss"