3 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Atlanta Coca-Cola Bottling Company
293 F.2d 300 (5th Cir. 1961) Cited 23 timesIn Atlanta Coca-Cola, for example, the court was concerned with the General Counsel's failure to produce evidence of discriminatory intent as to each of the individual employees, rather than with the placement of the burden of persuasion. See, e. g., 293 F.2d at 309 ("This is not a case where conflicting inferences of equal weight may be drawn from the record.")
N.L.R.B. v. Fla. Steel Corp.
308 F.2d 931 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 7 timesNo. 19145. October 23, 1962. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Peter Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. L. Robert Frank, Allen, Dell, Frank Trinkle, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges, and DeVANE, District Judge. CAMERON, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents one question for our determination: whether there is substantial evidence
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant
207 F.2d 165 (9th Cir. 1953) Cited 9 timesNo. 12985. September 15, 1953. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Asst. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Morris A. Solomon, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Raymond S. Smathurst, Washington, D.C., J.P. Stirling, Roscoe Watts, John T. Casey, Portland, Or., for appellee. Before HEALY, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, requests enforcement