§

Jefferson Stores, Inc.

201 N.L.R.B. 672 (N.L.R.B. 1973)
Jefferson Stores, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. Labor Board v. Steelworkers

    357 U.S. 357 (1958)   Cited 72 times
    In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."

  4. Seltenreich v. Town of Fairbanks

    348 U.S. 887 (1954)   Cited 70 times

    No. 271. November 22, 1954. Facts and opinion, D.C., 103 F. Supp. 319, 13 Alaska 582; 211 F.2d 83, 14 Alaska 568. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Denied.

  5. O'Brien v. Colonial Village, Inc.

    255 N.E.2d 205 (Ill. App. Ct. 1970)   Cited 22 times
    In O'Brien v. Colonial Village, Inc., 119 Ill.App.2d 105, 255 N.E.2d 205 (1970), the issue was whether the amended complaint stated a cause of action for injuries resulting from a criminal assault by a third person which occurred in a parking area of a shopping center.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Clearfield Cheese Company

    322 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Clearfield Cheese Co., 322 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1963), for example, the court enforced a bargaining order of the Labor Board based upon findings that a speech and a letter from the employer to his employees conveying a threat that the employer would go out of business if the union prevailed in the election had robbed the employees of free choice.

  7. Hawke v. McKee

    391 F.2d 262 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 1 times

    No. 25306. March 12, 1968. John Richard Hawke, pro se. Arthur R. Schor, Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before WISDOM, BELL and DYER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The above captioned case was regularly docketed by the Clerk of this Court and such notices as are required by this Court's rules were sent to the appellant by the Clerk. No brief having yet been filed as required by Rule 24, this appeal is dismissed. Rules of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Rule 20(3).

  8. Birmingham Fire Ins. Co. of Penn. v. Kight

    195 F.2d 178 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 1 times

    No. 13822. March 10, 1952. Alston Cockrell, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellant. Will O. Murrell, Will O. Murrell, Jr., Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and STRUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. By this motion, appellee invokes the exercise of the power of this court to dismiss the cause, under its rule 24(4) governing the filing of briefs, for default of appellant in not filing its brief within the time required under the rule. These are the facts: (1) The record