ยง

Jefferson National Bank

240 N.L.R.B. 1057 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Jefferson National Bank

15 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. O.A. Fuller Super Markets, Inc.

    374 F.2d 197 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 58 times
    Noting that when no anti-union animus exists, an employer is free to discharge a union employee "for a good reason, a bad reason, or no reason at all"

  3. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Cumberland Shoe Corporation

    351 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 49 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Cumberland we emphasized that "In no instance did any employee testify that he was told that the election was the only purpose of the card."

  5. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    296 F.2d 617 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 33 times
    Moving cause

  6. Maphis Chapman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    368 F.2d 298 (4th Cir. 1966)   Cited 22 times

    No. 9920. Argued October 5, 1965. Decided November 2, 1966. James A. Harper, Jr., Richmond, Va. (Francis V. Lowden, Jr., and Hunton, Williams, Gay, Powell Gibson, Richmond, Va., on brief), for petitioner. Paul M. Thompson, Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, on brief), for respondent. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF

  7. Southwest Regional Jt. Bd., v. N.L.R.B

    441 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 17 times
    Finding that the "proper question `is not whether an employee actually felt intimidated but whether the employer engaged in conduct which may reasonably be said to tend to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act'" (quoting Joy Silk Mills, supra, 185 F.2d at 743-44)

  8. United States v. Crowder

    346 F.2d 1 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that the variance between facts alleged in the indictment and facts proved at trial was permissible because the charge in the indictment protected him against another prosecution

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Peterson Brothers, Inc.

    342 F.2d 221 (5th Cir. 1965)   Cited 20 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Peterson Brothers, Inc., 5 Cir., 342 F.2d 221, the question arose in the following manner: The union requested recognition from the employer at a time that the union had in its possession cards signed by a majority of its employees.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill

    308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times

    No. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. ยง