§

Jefferson Chemical Co., Inc.

200 N.L.R.B. 996 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Jefferson Chemical Co., Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Dothan Eagle, Inc.

    434 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 30 times

    No. 28576. November 2, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles M. Paschal, Jr., Director, N.L.R.B., Region 15, New Orleans, La., David E. Rosenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Silver Spring, Md., for petitioner. C. Dale Stout, William F. Banta, Kullman, Lang, Keenan, Inman Bee, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Cone Mills Corporation

    373 F.2d 595 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 31 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 10585. Argued November 1, 1966. Decided February 6, 1967. Gary Green, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Wayne S. Bishop, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. Thornton H. Brooks, Greensboro, N.C. (McLendon, Brim, Holderness Brooks, Greensboro, N.C., on brief) for respondent. Before BOREMAN, BELL and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges. CRAVEN, Circuit Judge: The Company and the Union have negotiated

  6. International U., United Auto. v. N.L.R.B

    455 F.2d 1357 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 21 times
    Upholding Board's finding § 8 violation when photographing union activity "continued long after it became apparent that there would be no violence on the picket line"

  7. J.J. Newberry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    442 F.2d 897 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 17 times
    In Newberry, the status quo with regard to wage increases was unclear not so much because wage review was not predictable — on the contrary, an employee was reviewed every six months, "although the timing might vary by several months," 442 F.2d at 898 — but because wage increases were neither "automatic nor uniform.

  8. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,316 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355