ยง

Jays Foods, Inc.

228 N.L.R.B. 423 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Jays Foods, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Rapid Bindery, Inc.

    293 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 48 times
    In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Townhouse T. V. Appliances, Inc.

    531 F.2d 826 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 26 times
    Declining to enforce an order to resume the original business because taking back the subcontracted work would be burdensome

  4. N.L.R.B. v. George J. Roberts Sons, Inc.

    451 F.2d 941 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 15 times

    No. 135, Docket 71-1477. Argued October 18, 1971. Decided November 16, 1971. Steven C. Kahn, Atty., Eugene G. Goslee, Acting Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliot Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David D. Wach, Rockville Centre, N.Y. (Siben Siben, Bay Shore, N.Y., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MEDINA, MANSFIELD and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges. MULLIGAN

  5. Jays Foods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    292 F.2d 317 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 21 times
    Concluding that employer's decision to make changes in operations and abandon part of business was a basic management decision falling outside of NLRA's purview

  6. N.L.R.B. v. National Food Stores, Inc.

    332 F.2d 249 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 14416. May 27, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Anthony J. Obadal, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. O.S. Hoebreckx, Milwaukee, Wis., Sidney M. Libit, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This case is here on petition of the National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to Sec. 10(e) of the National

  7. Jay Foods, Inc. v. Local Union #1, American Bakery & Confectionery Workers' International Union

    255 F. Supp. 822 (N.D. Ill. 1966)   Cited 3 times

    No. 64 C 126. July 11, 1966. Blanksten Lansing, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs. Gilbert A. Cornfield, Kleiman, Cornfield Feldman, Chicago, Ill., for defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CAMPBELL, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs are presently before the court on motion to remand this cause back to the state court. ( 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 1447(c)). The cause was originally filed in the Superior Court of Cook County, Illinois (now the Circuit Court of Illinois, Cook County, Illinois) and therefrom removed to this court by