§

Jas. H. Matthews Co.

145 N.L.R.B. 1680 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Jas. H. Matthews Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Huffman v. United States

    297 F.2d 754 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 58 times
    Stating that it is "a basic misapprehension that a criminal trial must end with a verdict of guilty or a verdict of not guilty"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.

    300 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 47 times
    In NLRB v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 300 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1962), the court had applied the Universal Camera test, Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), to findings of fact made by the Board in evaluating election propaganda, a substantive determination by the Board, but the Court noted that cases cited by the Board seeking to limit review to whether the Board acted arbitrarily or capriciously "in fact support the view we [have taken]."

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Trancoa Chemical Corp.

    303 F.2d 456 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 36 times
    In NLRB v. Trancoa Chemical Corp., 303 F.2d 456 (1st Cir. 1962), the court reviewed a Board determination that misleading union campaign literature did not impair the employees' freedom of choice.

  4. Celanese Corporation of America v. N.L.R.B

    291 F.2d 224 (7th Cir. 1961)   Cited 29 times
    In Celanese Corp. of America v. N.L.R.B., 291 F.2d 224, 225 (7th Cir. 1961), this Court held that the Board's "wide discretion" lies in the initial promulgation of rules and regulations establishing the procedures and safeguards for conducting representation elections.

  5. Cross Company v. N.L.R.B

    286 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1961)   Cited 11 times

    No. 14237. February 2, 1961. Rehearing Denied April 15, 1961. See 288 F.2d 188. Robert C. Winter, Detroit, Mich. (Robert C. Winter, H. William Butler, David P. Wood, Clark, Klein, Brucker Waples, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin Pollack, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and Hans J. Lehmann, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. General Armature & Mfg. Co.

    192 F.2d 316 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 14 times

    No. 10472. Argued October 4, 1951. Filed November 7, 1951. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C., (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant Gen. Counsel, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Marvin C. Wahl, Baltimore, Md. (Blanche Genauer Wahl, Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, STALEY, and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. HASTIE, Circuit Judge. Two principal contentions are advanced

  7. Buffalo Arms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    224 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 2 times
    In Buffalo Arms, Inc. v. NLRB, 224 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1955), two unions and a company were parties to a consent election agreement.