Holding party's efforts to give the Board notice "adequate, if somewhat inartful" and reminding Board that its regulatory scheme "command it to read its procedural rules liberally" (citing 29 C.F.R. § 102.121)
In NLRB v. Giustina Bros. Lumber Co., 253 F.2d 371 (9th Cir. 1958), we held that Rule 102.46(b) prohibited the respondent from raising an issue before the Ninth Circuit where respondent's objection had been "so ambiguous as to be totally ineffective" in "adequately appris[ing]" the Board of the excepting party's intentions.