James Burleson, Jr., Complainant, v. Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency

4 Cited authorities

  1. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.

    510 U.S. 17 (1993)   Cited 12,389 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,575 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "
  3. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,615 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"
  4. Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

    409 U.S. 205 (1972)   Cited 788 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs not themselves the "direct objects of discrimination" have standing under the FHA