3 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
488 F.2d 114 (8th Cir. 1973) Cited 14 timesNo. 73-1246. Submitted October 16, 1973. Decided December 4, 1973. William H. Bruckner, Lincoln, Neb., for respondent. Marjory Gofreed, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Before LAY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and EISELE, District Judge. G. Thomas Eisele, District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation. LAY, Circuit Judge. The sole issue presented is whether there exists substantial evidence on the record as a whole to support the Board's finding that Wal-Mart
N.L.R.B. v. Hotel Conquistador, Inc.
398 F.2d 430 (9th Cir. 1968) Cited 8 timesDiscussing the principle that additional allegations in an NLRB case must be "closely related" to those contained in the original charge for the NLRB to be able to resolve the new dispute
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.
120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941) Cited 15 timesNo. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys