§

Jacqueline Y. Watts, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Mid-Atlantic Area), Agency.

01a04451 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 27, 2001)
Jacqueline Y. Watts, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Mid-Atlantic Area), Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,720 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Olmstead v. L. C

    527 U.S. 581 (1999)   Cited 944 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a state engages in disability discrimination if it institutionalizes individuals with disabilities when community-based placement could be reasonably accommodated, accounting for the resources available to the state and the needs of others with disabilities.

  3. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,633 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"