Jackson Daily News

20 Cited authorities

Touhy v. Ragen
340 U.S. 462 (1951) Cited 692 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that a subordinate agency employee cannot be compelled to comply with a subpoena duces tecum where a valid agency regulation prohibits such compliance in the absence of agency authorization, and where no authorization has been granted
United States v. Morgan
313 U.S. 409 (1941) Cited 852 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Secretary of Agriculture should not have been ordered to testify "regarding the process by which he reached the conclusions of his [stockyard market rate-setting] order, including the manner and extent of his study of the record and his consultation with subordinates"
Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath
339 U.S. 33 (1950) Cited 446 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that Administrative Procedure Act required deportation hearings even though current INS regulations did not
Morgan v. United States
304 U.S. 1 (1938) Cited 634 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that it is "not the function of the court to probe the mental processes of the Secretary"
Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader
310 U.S. 469 (1940) Cited 532 times
Holding that violent union take over of factory did not implicate antitrust laws
Switchmen's Union v. Board
320 U.S. 297 (1943) Cited 412 times
Holding federal courts do not have jurisdiction to review the Board's certification decision
A.F. of L. v. Labor Board
308 U.S. 401 (1940) Cited 340 times
Holding that certification is not a final order
Labor Board v. Gullett Gin Co.
340 U.S. 361 (1951) Cited 211 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act
Bi-Metallic Co. v. Colorado
239 U.S. 441 (1915) Cited 480 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a "general determination" dealing only with a "principle" and not applying it based on "individual grounds" is not sufficiently adjudicative to require due process
Buttfield v. Stranahan
192 U.S. 470 (1904) Cited 276 times 2 Legal Analyses
Denying that Congress may "invest administrative officials with the power of legislation"

Jackson Daily News

20 Cited authorities

Holding that a subordinate agency employee cannot be compelled to comply with a subpoena duces tecum where a valid agency regulation prohibits such compliance in the absence of agency authorization, and where no authorization has been granted

Holding that the Secretary of Agriculture should not have been ordered to testify "regarding the process by which he reached the conclusions of his [stockyard market rate-setting] order, including the manner and extent of his study of the record and his consultation with subordinates"

Holding that Administrative Procedure Act required deportation hearings even though current INS regulations did not

Holding that it is "not the function of the court to probe the mental processes of the Secretary"

Holding that violent union take over of factory did not implicate antitrust laws

Holding federal courts do not have jurisdiction to review the Board's certification decision

Holding that certification is not a final order

Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act

Holding that a "general determination" dealing only with a "principle" and not applying it based on "individual grounds" is not sufficiently adjudicative to require due process

Denying that Congress may "invest administrative officials with the power of legislation"