§

J. Weingarten, Inc.

137 N.L.R.B. 671 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
J. Weingarten, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.

    300 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 47 times
    In NLRB v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 300 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1962), the court had applied the Universal Camera test, Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951), to findings of fact made by the Board in evaluating election propaganda, a substantive determination by the Board, but the Court noted that cases cited by the Board seeking to limit review to whether the Board acted arbitrarily or capriciously "in fact support the view we [have taken]."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Whitelight Prod. Div. of White M.R

    298 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 11 times

    Nos. 5870, 5877. January 15, 1962. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for National Labor Relations Board. Robert Abelow, New York City, with whom Marshall C. Berger, William J. Abelow and Weil, Gotshal Manges, New York City, were on brief, for respondent in No. 5870. Allan R. Rosenberg, Boston, Mass., for petitioner in No. 5877. Before

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Red Rock Co.

    187 F.2d 76 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13375. February 15, 1951. Rehearing Denied March 9, 1951. Bernard Dunau, Atty., A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. M.E. Kilpatrick, Atlanta, Georgia, for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. In its general aspects this is an ordinary proceeding by the Board for the enforcement of one of its remedial

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Mathieson A. Works

    114 F.2d 796 (4th Cir. 1940)   Cited 18 times

    No. 4626. October 7, 1940. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Mathieson Alkali Works, Incorporated, to enforce an order of the board disestablishing an association of employees as a bargaining agency and directing the respondent to cease and desist from interfering with the rights of self-organization on the part of its employees. Petition denied. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Atty., National Labor Relations