§
J. I. Case Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Yawman & Erbe Mfg. Co.

    187 F.2d 947 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 34 times

    No. 107, Docket 21789. Argued February 7, 1951. Decided March 28, 1951. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Raymond M. Norton, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nixon, Hargrave, Middleton Devans, Rochester, N.Y., for respondent; Arthur L. Stern and William H. Morris, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRANK,

  3. Boston Herald-Traveler Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    223 F.2d 58 (1st Cir. 1955)   Cited 23 times

    No. 4915. June 6, 1955. Frank W. Crocker, Boston, Mass., with whom Levin H. Campbell, III, and Ropes, Gray, Best, Coolidge Rugg, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. MAGRUDER, Chief Judge. Petitioner

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Leland-Gifford Co.

    200 F.2d 620 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 23 times

    No. 4654. December 22, 1952. Maurice Alexandre, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associated Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Ernest L. Anderson, Worcester, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY, Circuit Judge. The principal issue presented by this petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor

  5. Taylor Forge Pipe Works v. N.L.R.B

    234 F.2d 227 (7th Cir. 1956)   Cited 16 times

    No. 11617. June 6, 1956. Robert W. MacDonald, Henry E. Seyfarth, Lee C. Shaw, Owen Fairweather, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mozart G. Ratner, Jacobs, Kamin Ratner, Chicago, Ill., for Forge and Machine Workers

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.

    235 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 14 times

    No. 14577. June 25, 1956. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Edward D. Friedman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Daniel J. Harrington, Atty., N.L.R.B., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Davies, Hardy Schenck, Christopher W. Hoey, New York City, George O. Bahrs, San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge. Herein we have a question of whether the Woolworth

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Otis Elevator Co.

    208 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 14 times

    No. 28, Docket 22727. Argued October 6, 1953. Decided November 10, 1953. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Mary E. Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Fayette S. Dunn, New York City, and Helen F. Humphrey, Washington, D.C. (Denham Humphrey, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent

  8. People v. Smith

    100 Cal.App.2d 153 (Cal. Ct. App. 1950)   Cited 1 times

    Docket No. 4511. October 26, 1950. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County denying a new trial. David Coleman, Judge. Affirmed. Prosecution for lewd conduct with a child. Order denying a new trial affirmed. S. Ward Sullivan and William C. Ring for Appellant. Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and Gilbert Harelson, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent. DORAN, J. Defendant was charged by information with the violation of section 288 of the Penal Code. A jury was waived. Defendant