§

J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc.

194 N.L.R.B. 19 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation

    354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 96 times
    In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.

    311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 71 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company

    360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 51 times
    Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

    366 F.2d 809 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 23 times

    No. 19448. September 30, 1966. Melvin J. Welles, Paul Elkind, Robert B. Schwartz, Attys., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges, and COX, District Judge. William Harold Cox, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Mississippi, sitting by designation. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: We hope that this opinion proves

  6. J.H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    399 F.2d 356 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 23744, 23909. July 23, 1968. Rehearings En Banc Denied October 1, 1968. Henry J. Read, Peter H. Beer, Richard B. Montgomery, New Orleans, La., for J.H. Rutter-Rex Mfg. Co. Inc. Ralph N. Jackson, New Orleans, La., Jacob Sheinkman, James J. Graham, New York City, for Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William S. Bishop, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. Ralph N. Jackson, New Orleans, La., for intervenor

  7. National Labor Bd. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex MFG

    245 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1957)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Company, 245 F.2d 594, we held that (1) the duty of the Company to bargain with the certified Union did not terminate with the calling or execution of the strike, (2) the Company had been guilty of unfair labor practices in refusing to bargain collectively with the Union and in interfering with the employees in the exercise of their right to organize and bargain collectively, and (3) the Union had not been guilty of any practice justifying employer in breaking off bargaining negotiations.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. United States Air Con. Corp.

    336 F.2d 275 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 14 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. United States Air Con. Corp., 336 F.2d 275, 276 (6th Cir. 1964), the court held that the Board's finding of constructive discharge was supported by substantial evidence where, although the five discharged employees were reemployed, it was not to their former or substantially equivalent positions.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Robert Haws Co.

    403 F.2d 979 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times
    Finding that plaintiff's right to back pay was not affected by his leaving the Detroit area to look for work in W. Virginia and Ohio

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Cashman Auto Co.

    223 F.2d 832 (1st Cir. 1955)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Cashman Auto Co., 223 F.2d 832, 836 (1st Cir. 1955), the First Circuit noted, over half a century ago, that the principle of mitigation of damages does not require success; it only requires an honest good faith effort by the complaining party.

  11. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,414 times   559 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party