§

J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc.

115 N.L.R.B. 388 (N.L.R.B. 1956)
J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc.

19 Cited authorities

  1. Lutwak v. United States

    344 U.S. 604 (1953)   Cited 932 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Distinguishing between an actual “agreement to conceal” and “an afterthought by the conspirator for the purpose of covering up”

  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  3. Dyer v. MacDougall

    201 F.2d 265 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 321 times
    Holding that witness demeanor may persuade a jury to "assume the truth of what he denied," but a court cannot allow a case to go to the jury on such evidence

  4. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  5. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co.

    204 F.2d 79 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 53 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Howell Chevrolet Co., 204 F.2d 79, 86 (9th Cir. 1953), we recognized that "carriage, behavior, bearing, manner and appearance of a witness, — his demeanor, —" may cause the trier of fact to reject uncontradicted testimony.

  7. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.

  8. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ray Smith Transport

    193 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 28 times

    No. 13612. December 20, 1951. Elmer Davis, Ch. Law Officer, NLRB, Fort Worth, Tex., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, W.D. White, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and STRUM, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Exonerating the trial examiner of specific charges of unfairness and bias, and adopting substantially whole his findings, conclusions and recommendations

  10. Majure v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    198 F.2d 735 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 21 times

    No. 13762. July 18, 1952. E.L. Snow, J.A. Covington, Jr., Meridian, Miss., for petitioner. John F. Preston, Jr., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, D.P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Before HOLMES, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. L.L. Majure and Mrs. Jo M. Majure, trading as Majure Transport Company, which will be referred to herein as the company, or employer, petition this Court to review and set aside an order