9 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Walton Mfg. Co.
369 U.S. 404 (1962) Cited 298 timesExplaining that the deferential standard of review is appropriate because the "[the ALJ] ... sees the witnesses and hears them testify, while the Board and the reviewing court look only at cold records"
Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
Labor Board v. Radio Engineers
364 U.S. 573 (1961) Cited 138 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that "[although] it might be better . . . to intrust [jurisdictional disputes] to arbitrators, . . . Congress, after discussion and consideration, decided to intrust this decision to the Board"
Dyer v. MacDougall
201 F.2d 265 (2d Cir. 1952) Cited 321 timesHolding that witness demeanor may persuade a jury to "assume the truth of what he denied," but a court cannot allow a case to go to the jury on such evidence
Labor Board v. Stowe Spinning Co.
336 U.S. 226 (1949) Cited 46 timesIn NLRB v. Stowe Spinning Co., 336 U.S. 226, 232-33, 69 S.Ct. 541, 544, 93 L.Ed. 638 (1949), the Court declined to enforce an order requiring an employer to make its meeting hall available to a union; the Board might legitimately bar discrimination against unions, the Court said, but could not require the employer to prefer unions over other potential users.
N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Banknote Company
281 F.2d 893 (9th Cir. 1960) Cited 18 timesNo. 16700. September 6, 1960. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Richard J. Scupi, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., J.H. Doesburg, Jr., J.N. Goddess, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before ORR and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. Before the Court is a petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order of the Board dated September
N.L.R.B. v. Cosmopolitan Studios, Inc.
291 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1961) Cited 4 timesNo. 166, Docket 26416. Argued January 13, 1961. Decided June 9, 1961. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel and Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel Duker, New York City (Harry Nassberg, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Abramson Lewis, New York City, for Blueprint, Photostat
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Federal Engineering Co.
153 F.2d 233 (6th Cir. 1946) Cited 15 timesNo. 10030. February 6, 1946. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order directed against Federal Engineering Company, Inc., and David Levine and others, a co-partnership, doing business as Federal Engineering Company. Order modified and, as thus modified, affirmed. Harold Cranefield, of Detroit, Mich. (David A. Morse, Malcolm F. Halliday, A. Norman Somers, Ida Klaus, and Thomas C. Marshall
N.L.R.B. v. Kalof Pulp Paper Corporation
290 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1961) Cited 1 timesNo. 16903. April 3, 1961. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and William J. Avrutis, Attys., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Max Bernbaum, Beverly Hills, Cal., and Gordon B. Severance, Monterey Park, Cal., for respondent Company. Warren Woods and Wilson, Woods Villalon, Washington, D.C., for respondent unions. Before BARNES, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. This case is before us