4 Cited authorities
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
N.L.R.B. v. Philamon Laboratories, Inc.
298 F.2d 176 (2d Cir. 1962) Cited 32 timesNo. 122, Docket 27028. Argued December 6, 1961. Decided January 17, 1962. William J. Avrutis, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asso. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Samuel M. Singer, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City, for respondent. Before MEDINA, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. MARSHALL, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling
211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954) Cited 29 timesNo. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,106 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"