Iroquois Nursing Home, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"
  2. Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    419 U.S. 301 (1974)   Cited 55 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"
  3. Parkwood v. N.L.R.B

    521 F.3d 404 (D.C. Cir. 2008)   Cited 5 times
    Explaining that section 10(e) meant “we have no jurisdiction to entertain claim”
  4. McDonald Partners, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.3d 1002 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that there must be a showing of "changed circumstances or new evidence calling the reliability of the old evidence into doubt."
  5. Rock-Tenn Co. v. N.L.R.B

    69 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 95-1347 95-1706 ARGUED SEPTEMBER 8, 1995 DECIDED NOVEMBER 3, 1995 Larry E. Forrester (argued), James Chadwick Hatmaker, Atlanta, GA, for Rock-Tenn Company. Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong, John D. Burgoyne (argued), Steven F. Rappaport, National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, William T. Little, National Labor Relations Board, Region 25, Indianapolis, IN,

  6. N.L.R.B. v. HQJM of Bayside

    518 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2008)   Cited 2 times

    No. 06-2253. Argued: December 5, 2007. Decided: March 10, 2008. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board petitioned for court to enforce its order, 2006 WL 2881901. ARGUED: D. Patton Pelfrey, Frost, Brown, Todd, Louisville, Kentucky, for Respondent. Elizabeth A. Heaney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Carey Robert Butsavage, Butsavage Associates, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Intervenor. ON BRIEF: John T. Lovett, Frost, Brown, Todd, Louisville, Kentucky, for

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Coach Co.

    237 F.2d 907 (6th Cir. 1956)   Cited 2 times

    No. 12846. October 30, 1956. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., Charles M. Ryan, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Anderson Snepp, Knoxville, Tenn., for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The only substantive question presented is whether the respondent could lawfully refuse to bargain with a union six weeks after it had been certified as bargaining representative, for