§

Ironworkers Local 340 (Consumers Energy Co.)

347 N.L.R.B. 578 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Ironworkers Local 340 (Consumers Energy Co.)

11 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. United States Smelting, Refining Mining v. Lowe

    338 U.S. 954 (1950)   Cited 51 times

    No. 489. February 13, 1950. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Facts and opinion, 175 F.2d 486, 12 Alaska 423; 176 F.2d 813, 12 Alaska 473; D.C., 66 F. Supp. 897, 11 Alaska 184; D.C., 74 F. Supp. 917, 11 Alaska 429. PER CURIAM: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The Court is of the opinion that a new trial should be granted. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion as to other questions presented, the judgments of the Court

  3. FPC Holdings, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    64 F.3d 935 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that company's knowledge of employee's union involvement was properly inferred from the fact that the employees discussed a planned union meeting openly in the company's warehouse and over the company's CB radio at a time when the company was closely monitoring one of the employee's behavior

  4. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  5. Sam's Club v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    141 F.3d 653 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times
    Granting request for enforcement of NLRB decision finding that an employer violated the NLRA where substantial evidence suggested that it disciplined an employee for circulating a petition about a wage grievance and distributing NLRB informational pamphlets to her co-workers

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Maritime Union of America

    175 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 40 times
    Bargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

    705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-1693. October 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jarka Corp., Phila

    198 F.2d 618 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 10 times

    No. 10715. Argued June 18, 1952. Filed August 15, 1952. Rehearing Denied October 8, 1952. Elizabeth W. Weston, Washington, D.C., (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant Gen. Counsel, Margaret M. Farmer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Louis H. Wilderman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richard H. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent Union. Robert G. Kelly, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief,

  9. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,987 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities

  10. Section 750.411h - Stalking; definitions; violation as misdemeanor; penalties; probation; conditions; evidence of continued conduct as rebuttable presumption; additional penalties

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 750.411h   Cited 165 times
    Defining stalking as "a willful course of conduct involving repeated or continuing harassment of another individual that would cause a reasonable person to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested and that actually causes the victim to feel terrorized, frightened, intimidated, threatened, harassed, or molested."

  11. Section 600.2950a - Personal protection order restraining or enjoining individual from engaging in conduct prohibited under MCL 750.411h, 750.411i, or 750.411s; facts alleging stalking; conduct; respondent required to carry concealed weapon; omitting address of residence from documents; reasons for issuing or refusing to grant order; mutual order prohibited; effectiveness, issuance, contents, and duration of order; duties of court clerk; entering order into L.E.I.N.; service; notice to law enforcement agency; enforcement; refusal or failure to comply; false statement to court; purchase or possession of firearm; person less than 18 years ; issuance to prisoner prohibited; definitions

    Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2950a   Cited 99 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Requiring the trial court to determine whether the petition "alleges facts that constitute stalking as defined in section 411h or 411i, or conduct that is prohibited under section 411s, of the Michigan penal code ...."