§

Iron Workers Local 433 (United Steel)

280 N.L.R.B. 1325 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Iron Workers Local 433 (United Steel)

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  4. United States v. McMillan

    508 F.2d 101 (8th Cir. 1974)   Cited 190 times
    In McMillan, for example, the officer did not satisfy the sixth factor by sufficiently identifying the defendant's voice.

  5. United States v. Alper

    449 F.2d 1223 (3d Cir. 1971)   Cited 47 times
    Holding that a supplemental jury charge was not unduly coercive because although it suggested jurors reexamine their views, it told them not to surrender their honest convictions

  6. Intern. Ass'n of Bridge, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times
    Enforcing Board's order finding unlawful inducement in part based on conversations at neutral employer's office gate between union agent and neutral employees who failed to report for work later that day, even though there was no testimony regarding the content of the conversations

  7. Kansas Electric Supply Co. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

    448 F.2d 647 (10th Cir. 1971)   Cited 21 times

    No. 315-70. September 20, 1971. J.A. Dickinson, Topeka, Kan. (Ralph E. Skoog of Dickinson, Crow Skoog, Topeka, Kan., on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee. Charles F.G. Raikes (Ralph W. Oman, James L. Grimes, Jr., of Cosgrove, Webb Oman, and James E. Smith, Topeka, Kan., on the brief), for defendant-appellant. Before CLARK, Associate Justice, and HILL and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Associate Justice Retired, United States Supreme Court, sitting by designation. McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. This is

  8. Markwell and Hartz, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    387 F.2d 79 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 21 times

    Nos. 23083, 23214. December 4, 1967. Richard C. Keenan, New Orleans, La., Wells T. Lovett, Owensboro, Ky., Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C. (amicus curiae) for petitioner Markwell and Hartz, Inc. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Morton J. Come, Atty., N.L.R.B., Louis Sherman, (intervenor) Charles R. Donnenfeld, Washington D.C. (intervenor), for respondent N.L.R.B. Marcel Mallet-Provost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Morton J. Come, Atty., N.L.R.B., Winthrop A. Johns, Washington

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Glaziers Glassworkers Local U

    632 F.2d 89 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 1 times

    No. 79-7445. Argued and Submitted July 3, 1980. Decided October 10, 1980. William R. Stewart, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert E. Jesinger, Brundage, Beeson Pappy, Los Angeles, Cal., Wylie, Leahy, Blunt McBride, San Jose, Cal., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WALLACE and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and EAST, District Judge. Honorable William G. East, United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation

  10. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,091 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"