§

Iron Workers Local 433 (United Steel)

293 N.L.R.B. 621 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Iron Workers Local 433 (United Steel)

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Ironworkers Local 433

    850 F.2d 551 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 16 times
    In Ironworkers, this circuit rejected the NLRB's conclusion "that any threat to picket a primary employer at a common situs will be conclusively presumed to have an unlawful purpose unless the union proclaims that its picketing will be conducted in a lawful manner."

  3. Intern. Ass'n of Bridge, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    598 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times
    Enforcing Board's order finding unlawful inducement in part based on conversations at neutral employer's office gate between union agent and neutral employees who failed to report for work later that day, even though there was no testimony regarding the content of the conversations

  4. Ramey Const. Co., Inc. v. Local U. No. 544

    472 F.2d 1127 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 16 times

    No. 72-1275. January 31, 1973. John Cosmic, John W. Broadfoot, Amarillo, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellants. Tom Upchurch, Jr., Amarillo, Tex., Buddy Wright, Fort Worth, Tex., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Before RIVES, THORNBERRY and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves the legality of common situs picketing conducted by the defendant-union on numerous construction sites in the Amarillo,